LeaseCrunch Blog
Read about ASC 842 & other lease accounting topics
Read about ASC 842 & other lease accounting topics
If your public company clients use spreadsheets to maintain their leases, you know what a pain those spreadsheets can be. They are error-prone, difficult to adjust, and can even increase risk. Or, as one audit partner recently phrased it, “Spreadsheets are cumbersome and fragile.”
Many public companies opted for spreadsheets when they first implemented the new lease standard. Some organizations made the deliberate decision to use spreadsheets because they’re “only” leases; they assumed based on old accounting standards that their spreadsheets would still be easy to maintain. Other organizations may not have properly planned for implementing the new lease standard and belatedly assumed that spreadsheets were their only option.
Whether your clients actively chose to use spreadsheets or ended up there by default, CPA firms and public companies now realize that spreadsheets aren’t a long-term solution for ongoing lease maintenance. Even if the implementation process was manageable with spreadsheets, many are encountering issues with Day 2 accounting.
Most public companies have completed their first years with the new lease accounting standard and some have already experienced why spreadsheets aren’t effective for ongoing maintenance such as lease modifications—which have been unusually prevalent as a result of the pandemic.
You may be wondering, “are there any feasible alternatives to Excel?” And to that we are excited to respond with an exuberant, “yes!” See the difference for yourself by checking out our calculator that compares the time you spend on ongoing maintenance tracking leases in a spreadsheet vs. using alternatives like lease accounting software.
Below you’ll find a detailed breakdown of why your company or CPA firm should avoid lease tracking spreadsheets and look for alternatives such as lease accounting software.
As CPA firms now know from experience with their public clients, a lease tracking spreadsheet presents major challenges during audits. Even though the first year of audits post-implementation has passed, managing ongoing maintenance in a lease tracking spreadsheet will only make future audits even more painful--and that will drive up costs for both the CPA firm and their clients. In fact, one public company told us recently that their audit fees increased by 25% due to the extra work with their lease accounting spreadsheets.
For you as the auditor to trust that your clients’ numbers are accurate, you need assurance that their controls don’t have material weaknesses. If there are multiple people working within a lease tracking spreadsheet and it has no built-in validation and minimal security options, that could cause major problems. If your clients are using a lease tracking spreadsheet that has even one error, any calculation could be wrong. When they’re relying on an easily breakable spreadsheet, it creates a lot more work and they need much stronger internal controls to prove that the numbers are accurate.
If you do find an issue during the audit then your clients are looking at rework, which means more time spent in the lease tracking spreadsheet. It’s incredibly frustrating to get deep into an audit and realize there is a material control weakness that could have been addressed earlier. Auditors cannot say that the organization’s finances are in good shape if the spreadsheets are a mess.
Spreadsheets require a lot of manual effort to make impairments, modifications, and revisions to leases. When a lease changes, the updates on a lease tracking spreadsheet are complex and nuanced.
The new lease standard has also added greater complexity to financial disclosures. In addition to the simple maturity schedule that was previously required, there are numerous additional quantitative calculations to include in footnote disclosures. The smallest error can break these formulas.
Further, most organizations have many people who touch leases. One leader at a major public accounting firm learned this lesson during implementation: he’d assumed that only a couple of people were involved with leases at his client organizations when really it was around four or five.
With that many people working in a lease tracking spreadsheet, it’s difficult to know who made which changes and whether you’re working in the latest version. Part of that confusion stems from the fact that spreadsheets are so easily compromised. In a spreadsheet, one user can edit, lock, duplicate, cut or otherwise ruin a spreadsheet. The time spent identifying and correcting human errors—which are inevitable—is time wasted unnecessarily.
Spreadsheets begin as a blank canvas. That means anyone working in a lease tracking spreadsheet first needs to add the calculations and processes required to fit their unique situation.
This may not have seemed like a big deal when implementing the new lease accounting standard; any new standard requires some initial heavy lifting. What has been a surprise for many is the ongoing maintenance required for tracking leases. Due to those nuanced calculations in the new lease standard, any changes (and there will be changes) after initial setup take hours of work to maintain accuracy.
Multiply that over many leases at a large company and you have a major time suck. When asked about the prospect of using spreadsheets, one Manager of Corporate Reporting for a public company responded, “We only have a couple of dozen leases—I can’t see how an organization can manage their lease portfolio effectively in a spreadsheet.”
In addition to building your spreadsheets, your clients also need to build reports for presenting information to internal and external teams. The team might be well-versed in what the lease tracking spreadsheet says, but they’ll need to allocate additional time to generating journal entries, amortization schedules, and footnotes, which are standard for most lease accounting software.
Accountants and finance teams have long relied on spreadsheets for lease accounting, despite the pain points listed above. It’s time for them to explore the world of alternatives to Excel, because while relying on spreadsheets was feasible under ASC 840, spreadsheets are simply not feasible long-term for lease accounting under the new standard, ASC 842. Public companies may be reluctant to use lease accounting software because they worry about having to retrain staff on a new system, or that it will cost too much; however, the right solution will ultimately save the organization time and money.
Benefits of lease accounting software include:
It’s also important to keep in mind that not all lease accounting software is created equally. LeaseCrunch sets itself apart from other options in the market with the following critical benefits:
While using Excel moving forward is going to be increasingly difficult for companies and CPA firms that must abide by the new lease accounting standards, we understand that there are still companies and firms that wish to continue to use Excel. That’s why LeaseCrunch offers the ability for companies to export their lease accounting data straight into Excel, rather than using alternatives to Excel spreadsheets.
Want to learn more about LeaseCrunch as one of the best alternatives to Excel on the market? Schedule a demo to see the tool in action and ask us about our free trial!
Try the easiest lease accounting software on the market today!